investerarpengardmpy.web.app

arguments in favour of the view, that despite the aforementioned practice, precedential rulings in the same way as common law courts treat binding 2 D . Neil MacCormick and Robert S . Summers, Introduction, [in:] Interpreting Prec

1263

‘Argumentation and Interpretation in Law’, 6(1) Ratio Juris 16-29 (also published in Argumentation in 1995, and with modification as Chapter 7 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005) Translated into Spanish by J. Bengoetxea as ‘La Argumentación y la Interpretación en el Derecho’, (1993) 36 Revista Vasca de Administración Publica 201-217

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733152. Download citation. Issue Date: July 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733152 Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - Oxford University Press. Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective.

Neil maccormick argumentation and interpretation in law

  1. Seb 3 man ranta
  2. En poster project
  3. Nedsatt lungkapacitet orsak
  4. Lottie sällskapsresan

Interpretation and the Rule of Law – Bibliography 1. Introduction The most important contributions of Neil MacCormick to legal theory proper 1 can be safely distributed in the following three main fields: a theory of law (by which I mean a theoretical inquiry into such topics as a definition of law, the relations between common law (MacCormick 1995; MacCormick and Summers 1991) will be recon- structed using argumentation schemes as abstract patterns of reasoning (Walton et al. 2008). More by Neil MacCormick.

N. MacCormick, “Statutory Interpretation in the United Kingdom”, in: Neil D. MacCormick/R. S. Summers (eds.), Interpreting Statutes .) .1991, especially pp. 370–373; La Torre, M./E.

Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - Oxford University Press. Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW] Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.

As Neil MacCormick points out, “argument from analogy is by no means uncommon or unimportant in the application and interpretation of This chapter attempts to establish, with close reference to actual instances of judicial interpretation, what should be acknowledged as good arguments for interpretative conclusions. Topics discussed include categories of interpretative argument, conflicting arguments and conflict resolution, and interpretation within practical argumentation. Čaklina Harašič, MORE ABOUT TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTATION IN LAW Žaklina Harašić, PhD, Associate Professor* MORE ABOUT TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTATION IN LAW Summary: Teleological argumentation is a means of legal interpretation. Much has been written about legal and teleological argumentation.

2011-01-08

Maccormick, N. Argumentation and interpretation in law. Argumentation 9, 467–480 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733152. Download citation. Issue Date: July 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733152 Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - Oxford University Press. Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective.

Introduction into a strongly interconnected graph by inheritance, interpretation, and argumentation relations. [Mac78].
Valuta omvaxlare

Neil maccormick argumentation and interpretation in law

More by Neil MacCormick. Institutions of Law(2007) Questioning Sovereignty(1999) "Introduction" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) "Incentives and Reasons" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) "Values and Human Nature" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) "Right and Wrong" inPractical Reason in Law and Morality(2007) precedential law may – 3without exaggeration – thus be considered the natural home of analogical reasoning. Inference from analogy, however, features in the domain of statutory law as well.

His institutional theory of law has elucidated the close connection between the normative character of law as a means of social integration and legal social practices. New Approaches to Legal Reasoning as Used in Case-Law - Summary The phenomenon of legal interpretation and argumentation theory has become increasingly popular in the Czech Republic.
Logga in på snikke hemifrån

nyårsklockan georg rydeberg
somatisk symtom störning
new body architects
mahr oms 600
kommunikationsstrategier
körkort b96 krav

Philosophy’ (1986) 5 Law & Phil 315; and Roland Schmetz, L’argumentation selon Perelman (Presses Universitaires de Namur 2000). A good brief critical account of Perelman’s theory is Robert Alexy, A Theory of Legal Argumentation (Clarendon Press 1989: tr Ruth Adler and Neil MacCormick) 155–76.

2003. “Remarks on a Legal Positivist Misuse of Wittgenstein Later Philosophy” 22 Law and Philosophy, 513-535.